An unofficial passion project born from watching my sister — a public defender — navigate an entirely paper-based courtroom system. Discovery interviews with her colleagues led to user stories, workflows, and wireframes for a population rarely considered in product design.
Overview
My sister is a criminal defense attorney working as a public defender. I'm constantly surprised how much the county still relies on paper — files and papers covering every surface, laptops shut off, information scattered across disconnected systems.
This project is an attempt to give courtroom attorneys — especially public defenders — a simple tablet app to keep track of their cases. Public defenders carry up to 10 times as many clients as a private attorney, making the cost of disorganisation far higher than in any private practice.
The core problem
"Public defenders are among the most skilled attorneys in the room — but the systems around them are designed for paper, not for the pace they work at."
This app assumes enterprise-wide access to the same data used by courts, sheriffs, prosecution, and defense — making it a coordination tool, not just a personal organiser.
Research & discovery
I interviewed multiple colleagues of my sister — public defenders working in active courtrooms — to understand their day-to-day workflow and pain points. The conversations revealed a population under enormous time pressure, deeply skilled at reading their environment, but hampered by fragmented information and paper-based processes.
A recurring theme: when attorneys cover for a colleague, move courtrooms, or handle holiday bond court, there's a frustrating learning curve and communication barrier. The knowledge they need exists somewhere — it's just not accessible in the moment they need it.
User stories
Wireframes
Core flows
Client details
The client detail view surfaces case history, current charges, notes from the attorney and their team, and quick access to relevant statutes and sentencing ranges — all in one place, on a tablet they can carry into the courtroom.
The design prioritises speed and scannability. Attorneys in active courtrooms can't scroll through dense text — they need to find what they need in seconds.
Outcome
4
Core user stories validated through attorney interviews
↑10x
Caseload of a public defender vs. private attorney
0
Existing digital tools designed specifically for this workflow
This remained an unofficial project — no client, no engineering team, no ship date. But the research was real, the user stories were validated, and the problem is still unsolved. The county courtroom system is still largely paper-based.
Reflection
This is one of the projects I'd most like to revisit — and I'd bring Claude Code into it. The gap between what these attorneys need and what exists is still wide open. With AI-assisted prototyping I could build a working version fast enough to put back in front of real public defenders and get meaningful feedback, rather than stopping at wireframes.
The deeper lesson from this project: the most underserved users are often the ones no product team ever talks to. Public defenders don't have a procurement budget or an enterprise sales contact. But the design problems they face are as complex and consequential as anything in fintech.